Intel Atom Z510 vs E3815 |
Released April, 2008
Intel Atom Z510
- 1.1 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Atom Z510
 | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Released October, 2013
Intel Atom E3815
- 1.46 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the E3815
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom Z510 vs E3815
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Atom Z510 | vs | E3815 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 1.46 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 441 | |||
| BGA 1170 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 2W | 5W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 0.48 $/year | 1.2 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.63 pt/W | 4.58 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 1.63W | 4.06W | |
details | Atom Z510 | vs | E3815 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 1 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 1.47 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.1 GHz | 1.47 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.1 GHz | 1.47 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | HD | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 400 MHz | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel Atom Z510  Report a correction |  Intel Atom E3815 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $31 | $82 | |
| Intel Atom E3815 vs Celeron J1900 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $31 | $132 | |
| Intel Atom E3815 vs Celeron N2820 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $31 | $17 | |
| Intel Atom E3815 vs Z3735F | ||
| | VS |  |
| $31 | $52 | |
| Intel Atom E3815 vs E3845 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $31 | ||
| Intel Atom E3815 vs N4200 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $31 | $107 | |
| Intel Atom E3815 vs Celeron N3050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $31 | $130 | |
| Intel Atom E3815 vs Celeron 1047UE | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
