0 Comments
| Intel Atom Z510 vs E3815 |
Released April, 2008
Intel Atom Z510
- 1.1 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Atom Z510
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Released October, 2013
Intel Atom E3815
- 1.46 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the E3815
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom Z510 vs E3815
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Atom Z510
207.5
Atom E3815
627
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Atom Z510
207.5
Atom E3815
628
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Atom Z510
16.4 MB/s
Atom E3815
236.8 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Atom Z510
194
Atom E3815
362
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Atom Z510 | vs | E3815 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 1.46 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
441 | |||
BGA 1170 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 2W | 5W | |
Annual home energy cost | 0.48 $/year | 1.2 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.63 pt/W | 4.58 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 1.63W | 4.06W |
details | Atom Z510 | vs | E3815 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 1 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 1.47 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.1 GHz | 1.47 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.1 GHz | 1.47 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | HD | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 400 MHz | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Atom Z510 ![]() | Intel Atom E3815 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$31 | $107 | |
Intel Atom E3815 vs Celeron N2807 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$31 | $225 | |
Intel Atom E3815 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$31 | $82 | |
Intel Atom E3815 vs Celeron J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$31 | $132 | |
Intel Atom E3815 vs Celeron N2820 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$31 | $117 | |
Intel Atom E3815 vs Core2 Duo E4500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$31 | $130 | |
Intel Atom E3815 vs Celeron 1047UE | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$31 | ||
Intel Atom E3815 vs x5-Z8350 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||