Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom Z3735F

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z3735F

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Front view of AMD Athlon Neo 40

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon Neo 40

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon Neo 40 vs the Intel Atom Z3735F.

Features Key features of the Atom Z3735F  vs Athlon Neo 40 

clock speed

Atom Z3735F
1.33 GHz
Athlon Neo 40
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom Z3735F  vs
Athlon Neo 40 
Clock speed 1.33 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Atom Z3735F  vs
Athlon Neo 40 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 90°C Unknown - 95°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
GPU clock speed 311 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 646 MHz N/A

power consumption

TDP 2.2W 15W
Annual home energy cost 0.53 $/year 3.61 $/year
Typical power consumption 1.79W 12.19W
Intel Atom Z3735F
Report a correction
AMD Athlon Neo 40
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus