Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom Z3735E

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z3735E

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer Jan, 2014 vs Feb, 2007 Release date over 6 years later
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Front view of AMD Athlon 3500+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 3500+

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 1.33 GHz More than 65% higher clock speed
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Features Key features of the Atom Z3735E  vs Athlon 3500+ 

clock speed

Atom Z3735E
1.33 GHz
Athlon 3500+
2.2 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom Z3735E  vs
Athlon 3500+ 
Clock speed 1.33 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 36.56W

details

Atom Z3735E  vs
Athlon 3500+ 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
GPU clock speed 311 MHz N/A
Intel Atom Z3735E
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 3500+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus