Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom S1289

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom S1289

Report a correction
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Lower typical power consumption 11.46W vs 28.44W 2.5x lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 3.4 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 2.5x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 12.35 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD A10 5750M

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 5750M

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Higher clock speed 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz 25% higher clock speed
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.23 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Mar, 2013 vs Dec, 2012 Release date 3 months later

Features Key features of the Atom S1289  vs A10 5750M 

clock speed

Atom S1289
2 GHz
A10 5750M
2.5 GHz

L2 cache

Atom S1289
1 MB
A10 5750M
4 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Atom S1289
2 GHz
A10 5750M
3.23 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Atom S1289
2 GHz
A10 5750M
2.5 GHz

TDP

Atom S1289
14.1W
A10 5750M
35W

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom S1289  vs
A10 5750M 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 14.1W 35W
Annual home energy cost 3.4 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 12.35 $/year 30.66 $/year
Typical power consumption 11.46W 28.44W

details

Atom S1289  vs
A10 5750M 
Architecture x86-64 ARM
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2 GHz 3.23 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 2.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2 GHz 3.23 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 8650G
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 533 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 720 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Intel Atom S1289
Report a correction
AMD A10 5750M
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus