Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom S1220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom S1220

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Newer Dec, 2012 vs Jan, 2009 Release date over 3 years later
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Lower typical power consumption 6.58W vs 12.19W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Lower annual home energy cost 1.95 $/year vs 3.61 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 7.1 $/year vs 13.14 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Sempron 210U

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 210U

Report a correction
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Features Key features of the Atom S1220  vs Sempron 210U 

clock speed

Atom S1220
1.6 GHz
Sempron 210U
1.5 GHz

L2 cache

Atom S1220
1 MB
Sempron 210U
0.25 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Atom S1220
1.6 GHz
Sempron 210U
1.8 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Atom S1220
1.6 GHz
Sempron 210U
1.5 GHz

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom S1220  vs
Sempron 210U 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 8.1W 15W
Annual home energy cost 1.95 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 7.1 $/year 13.14 $/year
Typical power consumption 6.58W 12.19W

details

Atom S1220  vs
Sempron 210U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.6 GHz 1.8 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Atom S1220
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 210U
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus