Winner
Intel Atom N470
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Atom N470 based on its .
See full details Intel Atom N470 vs N270 |
Released January, 2010
Intel Atom N470
- 1.83 GHz
- Single core
4.6 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Atom N470
 | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
VS
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N470 vs N270 among laptop CPUs (up to 15W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 4.6 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the N270 vs the N470. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom N470 vs N270
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Atom N470 | vs | N270 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.83 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 6.5W | 2.5W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.57 $/year | 0.6 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.75 pt/W | 9.71 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 5.28W | 2.03W | |
details | Atom N470 | vs | N270 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
| Transistor count | 123,000,000 | 47,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.83 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.83 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.83 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Integrated | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 200 MHz | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel Atom N470  Report a correction |  Intel Atom N270 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $32 | $64 | |
| N270 vs N450 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $32 | $17 | |
| N270 vs Z3735F | ||
| | VS |  |
| $32 | $64 | |
| N270 vs N455 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $32 | $42 | |
| N270 vs N2600 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $32 | $69 | |
| N270 vs 630 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $32 | $63 | |
| N270 vs D525 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $32 | ||
| N270 vs 350 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
