0 Comments
| Intel Atom N450 vs AMD C 50 |
Released January, 2010
Intel Atom N450
- 1.66 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Atom N450
![]() | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 494 | ![]() | Higher clock speed 1.66 GHz |
![]() | Better performance per watt 4.63 pt/W |
VS
Released January, 2011
AMD C 50
- 1 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD C 50
![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 32,500 MB/s |
![]() | Has virtualization support Yes | ![]() | Newer manufacturing process 40 nm |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Atom N450CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 494 | vs | 19.8 | Around 25x better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 1.66 GHz | vs | 1 GHz | More than 65% higher clock speed | |||
Better performance per watt | 4.63 pt/W | vs | 3.24 pt/W | Around 45% better performance per watt | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 32,500 MB/s | vs | 25,700 MB/s | More than 25% better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 40 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Newer | Jan, 2011 | vs | Jan, 2010 | Release date a year later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom N450 vs AMD C 50
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Atom N450 | vs | AMD C 50 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.66 GHz | 1 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
AMD64 | |||
AMD-V | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR2-667 | |||
DDR2 |
details | Atom N450 | vs | AMD C 50 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 40 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 10 | 5 | |
Voltage range | 0.8 - 1.18V | 1.05 - 1.35V | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Integrated | Radeon™ HD 6250 | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 5.5W | 9W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.32 $/year | 2.17 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 4.82 $/year | 7.88 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 4.63 pt/W | 3.24 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 4.47W | 7.31W |
Intel Atom N450 ![]() | AMD C 50 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $32 | |
N450 vs N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $42 | |
N450 vs N2600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | ||
N450 vs N280 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | ||
N450 vs N550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$112 | ||
50 vs 3225 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
50 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$130 | ||
50 vs 3210M | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||