Intel Atom N2800 vs D425 |
Released December, 2011
Intel Atom N2800
- 1.86 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Atom N2800
 | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the D425 vs the N2800. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom N2800 vs D425
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Atom N2800 | vs | D425 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 6.5W | 10W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.57 $/year | 2.41 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 5.28 pt/W | 1.89 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 5.28W | 8.13W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 2,500 MT/s | 2,500 MT/s | |
details | Atom N2800 | vs | D425 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 45 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.87 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.87 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Integrated | Integrated | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR3-800 | |||
| DDR2-800 | |||
| DDR2-667 | |||
| DDR2 | |||
| Channels | Single Channel | Single Channel | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 6,400 MB/s | 6,400 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 4,997.12 MB | 4,096 MB | |
 Intel Atom N2800  Report a correction |  Intel Atom D425 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $82 | $47 | |
| Intel Celeron J1900 vs Atom N2800 | ||
 | VS | |
| $43 | $47 | |
| Intel Atom C2350 vs N2800 | ||
 | VS | |
| $47 | $47 | |
| Intel Atom D2550 vs N2800 | ||
 | VS | |
| $42 | $47 | |
| Intel Atom N2600 vs N2800 | ||
 | VS | |
| $63 | $47 | |
| Intel Atom D525 vs N2800 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $200 | $42 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo E8500 vs Atom D425 | ||
 | VS | |
| $134 | $42 | |
| Intel Celeron 847 vs Atom D425 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||
