0 Comments
| Intel Atom N2800 vs D425 |
Released December, 2011
Intel Atom N2800
- 1.86 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Atom N2800
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the D425 vs the N2800. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom N2800 vs D425
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Atom N2800
1,082
Atom D425
596
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Atom N2800
456
Atom D425
438
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Atom N2800
29,200 MB/s
Atom D425
28.6 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Atom N2800
1,037
Atom D425
560
GeekBench
Atom N2800
1,413
Atom D425
946
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Atom N2800
619
Atom D425
343
PassMark (Single Core)
Atom N2800
285
Atom D425
276
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Atom N2800 | vs | D425 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 6.5W | 10W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.57 $/year | 2.41 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 5.28 pt/W | 1.89 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 5.28W | 8.13W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 2,500 MT/s | 2,500 MT/s |
details | Atom N2800 | vs | D425 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.87 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.87 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Integrated | Integrated | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
DDR2-800 | |||
DDR2-667 | |||
DDR2 | |||
Channels | Single Channel | Single Channel | |
Maximum bandwidth | 6,400 MB/s | 6,400 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 4,997.12 MB | 4,096 MB |
Intel Atom N2800 ![]() | Intel Atom D425 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $47 | |
Intel Celeron J1900 vs Atom N2800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$43 | $47 | |
Intel Atom C2350 vs N2800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$47 | $47 | |
Intel Atom D2550 vs N2800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$42 | $47 | |
Intel Atom N2600 vs N2800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$63 | $47 | |
Intel Atom D525 vs N2800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $42 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 vs Atom D425 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $42 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs Atom D425 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||