Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Atom N2800

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Atom N2800

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom N2800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom N2800

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1.86 GHz vs 1 GHz More than 85% higher clock speed
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 21.1 vs 19.8 More than 5% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Much higher GPU clock speed 640 MHz vs 276 MHz More than 2.2x higher GPU clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Better performance per watt 5.28 pt/W vs 3.24 pt/W Around 65% better performance per watt
Higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 90 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Newer Dec, 2011 vs Jan, 2011 Release date 11 months later
Front view of AMD C 50

Reasons to consider the
AMD C 50

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 32,500 MB/s vs 29,200 MB/s More than 10% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom N2800 vs AMD C 50

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom N2800
1,082
AMD C 50
722

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom N2800
29,200 MB/s
AMD C 50
32,500 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom N2800
1,037
AMD C 50
678

GeekBench

Atom N2800
1,413
AMD C 50
982

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Atom N2800
21.1
AMD C 50
19.8

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom N2800  vs
AMD C 50 
Clock speed 1.86 GHz 1 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1066
DDR3

details

Atom N2800  vs
AMD C 50 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Integrated Radeon™ HD 6250
GPU clock speed 640 MHz 276 MHz

power consumption

TDP 6.5W 9W
Annual home energy cost 1.57 $/year 2.17 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.69 $/year 7.88 $/year
Performance per watt 5.28 pt/W 3.24 pt/W
Typical power consumption 5.28W 7.31W
Intel Atom N2800
Report a correction
AMD C 50
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus