Intel Atom N280 vs N270

	Performance
	Benchmark performance using all cores
Atom N280 4.0 Atom N270 4.0 Atom N450 4.0
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

	Single-core Performance
	Individual core benchmark performance
Atom N280 4.4 Atom N270 4.3 Atom N450 4.4
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

	Integrated Graphics
	Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Atom N280 0.0 Atom N270 0.0 Atom N450 n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

	Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)
	Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Atom N280 0.0 Atom N270 0.0 Atom N450 n.d.
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

	Performance per Watt
	How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Atom N280 5.6 Atom N270 5.6 Atom N450 6.3
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

	Value
	Are you paying a premium for performance?
Atom N280 n.d. Atom N270 5.3 Atom N450 9.5
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

0.9	CPUBoss Score
	Combination of all six facets
Atom N280 0.0 Atom N270 0.9 Atom N450 5.3

Winner
Intel Atom N280

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Atom N280 based on its .

See full details

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

VS

Intel Atom N280

Front view of Intel Atom N280

Front view of Intel Atom N270

Intel Atom N270

Join the discussion

Front view of Intel Atom N280

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom N280

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the N280 vs the N270.

Front view of Intel Atom N270

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom N270

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the N270 vs the N280.

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

536

516

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

384

369

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

25,750 MB/s

24,800 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

523

491

GeekBench

878

854

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

507

483

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

290

271

PassMark (Single Core)

253

236

summary	Atom N280	vs	N270
Clock speed	1.66 GHz		1.6 GHz
Cores	Single core		Single core
Socket type
437
features
Has a NX bit	Yes		Yes
Supports trusted computing	No		No
Has virtualization support	No		No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling	Yes		Yes
power consumption
TDP	2.5W		2.5W
Annual home energy cost	0.6 $/year		0.6 $/year
Performance per watt	10.19 pt/W		9.71 pt/W
Typical power consumption	2.03W		2.03W
bus
Architecture	FSB		FSB
Number of links	1		1
Clock speed	667 MHz		533 MHz

details	Atom N280	vs	N270
Architecture	x86		x86
Threads	2		2
L2 cache	0.5 MB		0.5 MB
L2 cache per core	0.5 MB/core		0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process	45 nm		45 nm
Transistor count	47,000,000		47,000,000
Max CPUs	1		1
Clock multiplier	10		12
Voltage range	0.9 - 1.16V		0.9 - 1.16V
overclocking
Overclocked clock speed	1.88 GHz		1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water)	1.67 GHz		1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air)	1.88 GHz		1.87 GHz
integrated graphics
GPU	None		None
Label	N/A		N/A
Latest DirectX	N/A		N/A
Number of displays supported	N/A		N/A
GPU clock speed	N/A		N/A
Turbo clock speed	N/A		N/A
3DMark06	N/A		N/A

Intel Atom N280

Report a correction

Intel Atom N270

Report a correction

VS

Intel Atom N450 vs N280

VS

Intel Atom N450 vs N270

Comments

comments powered by Disqus