Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom N280

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom N280

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Atom N280 vs the AMD Sempron 200U.

Front view of AMD Sempron 200U

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 200U

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Sempron 200U vs the Intel Atom N280.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom N280 vs Sempron 200U

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom N280  vs
Sempron 200U 
Clock speed 1.66 GHz 1 GHz
Cores Single core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 2.5W 8W
Annual home energy cost 0.6 $/year 1.93 $/year
Performance per watt 10.19 pt/W 1.36 pt/W
Typical power consumption 2.03W 6.5W

details

Atom N280  vs
Sempron 200U 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.88 GHz 1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.67 GHz 1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.88 GHz 1 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Atom N280
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 200U
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus