CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N270 vs 330 among laptop CPUs (up to 15W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

0.9

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Atom N270 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Atom N270  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom N270

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom N270

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Front view of Intel Atom 330

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom 330

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 330 vs the N270.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom N270 vs 330

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom N270
24,800 MB/s
Atom 330
25,200 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Atom N270
483
Atom 330
824.5

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom N270  vs
330 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
437

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 2.5W 8W
Annual home energy cost 0.6 $/year 1.93 $/year
Performance per watt 9.71 pt/W 3.77 pt/W
Typical power consumption 2.03W 6.5W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 533 MHz 533 MHz

details

Atom N270  vs
330 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm
Transistor count 47,000,000 94,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 12 12
Voltage range 0.9 - 1.16V 0.9 - 1.16V

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.87 GHz 2.05 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 207.6 322.4
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.87 GHz 2.05 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Atom N270
Report a correction
Intel Atom 330
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus