Intel Atom N270 vs AMD G G-T52R |
Released June, 2008
Intel Atom N270
- 1.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Atom N270
 | Much better performance per watt 9.71 pt/W | | Lower typical power consumption 2.03W |
| | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.87 GHz | | Lower annual home energy cost 0.6 $/year |
VS
Released January, 2011
AMD G G-T52R
- 1.5 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD G G-T52R
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Has virtualization support Yes |
| | Newer manufacturing process 40 nm | | Newer Jan, 2011 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better performance per watt | 9.71 pt/W | vs | 0.69 pt/W | More than 14x better performance per watt | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower typical power consumption | 2.03W | vs | 14.63W | 7.2x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.87 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 0.6 $/year | vs | 4.34 $/year | 7.2x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 2.19 $/year | vs | 15.77 $/year | 7.2x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Newer manufacturing process | 40 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2011 | vs | Jun, 2008 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom N270 vs G G-T52R
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Atom N270 | vs | G G-T52R |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 2.5W | 18W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 0.6 $/year | 4.34 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 2.19 $/year | 15.77 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 9.71 pt/W | 0.69 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 2.03W | 14.63W | |
details | Atom N270 | vs | G G-T52R |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 40 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 12 | 7 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.87 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | AMD Radeon HD 6310 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 500 MHz | |
 Intel Atom N270  Report a correction |  AMD G G-T52R Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $32 | $64 | |
| N270 vs N450 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $32 | $64 | |
| N270 vs N455 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $32 | $42 | |
| N270 vs N2600 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $32 | ||
| N270 vs G-T44R | ||
| | VS |  |
| $32 | ||
| N270 vs 1BGHz | ||
| | VS |  |
| $32 | $17 | |
| N270 vs Z3735F | ||
| | VS |  |
| $32 | $47 | |
| N270 vs D2550 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
