Intel Atom N270 vs AMD G G-T48N |
Released June, 2008
Intel Atom N270
- 1.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Atom N270
 | Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz | | Lower typical power consumption 2.03W |
| | Lower annual home energy cost 0.6 $/year | | Lower annual commercial energy cost 2.19 $/year |
VS
Released January, 2011
AMD G G-T48N
- 1.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD G G-T48N
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | More l2 cache 1 MB |
| | Has virtualization support Yes | | Newer manufacturing process 40 nm |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1.6 GHz | vs | 1.4 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower typical power consumption | 2.03W | vs | 14.63W | 7.2x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 0.6 $/year | vs | 4.34 $/year | 7.2x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 2.19 $/year | vs | 15.77 $/year | 7.2x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Newer manufacturing process | 40 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2011 | vs | Jun, 2008 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
| More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Atom N270 vs G G-T48N
clock speed
L2 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Atom N270 | vs | G G-T48N |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Atom N270 | vs | G G-T48N |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 40 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 12 | 7 | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | AMD Radeon HD 6310 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 500 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 2.5W | 18W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 0.6 $/year | 4.34 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 2.19 $/year | 15.77 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 2.03W | 14.63W | |
 Intel Atom N270  Report a correction |  AMD G G-T48N Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $64 | $32 | |
| N450 vs N270 | ||
 | VS | |
| $69 | $32 | |
| 630 vs N270 | ||
 | VS | |
| $63 | $32 | |
| D525 vs N270 | ||
 | VS | |
| $42 | $32 | |
| N2600 vs N270 | ||
 | VS | |
| $64 | $32 | |
| N455 vs N270 | ||
 | VS | |
| $32 | ||
| 1BGHz vs N270 | ||
 | VS | |
| $17 | $32 | |
| Z3735F vs N270 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| 7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||
