0 Comments
| Intel Atom N270 vs AMD Athlon 900 |
Released June, 2008
Intel Atom N270
- 1.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Atom N270
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz |
![]() | Has a NX bit Yes | ![]() | More l2 cache 0.5 MB |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 180 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 1.6 GHz | vs | 0.9 GHz | Around 80% higher clock speed | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
More l2 cache | 0.5 MB | vs | 0.25 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.87 GHz | vs | 0.98 GHz | More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | vs | 0.9 GHz | Around 80% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon 900 vs the Intel Atom N270. | |||||||
Features Key features of the Atom N270 vs Athlon 900
clock speed
Atom N270
1.6 GHz
Athlon 900
0.9 GHz
L2 cache
Atom N270
0.5 MB
Athlon 900
0.25 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Atom N270
1.87 GHz
Athlon 900
0.98 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Atom N270
1.6 GHz
Athlon 900
0.9 GHz
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Atom N270 | vs | Athlon 900 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 0.9 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
437 | |||
Slot A | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
bus | |||
Clock speed | 533 MHz | 200 MHz |
details | Atom N270 | vs | Athlon 900 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.25 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 180 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 0.98 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | 0.9 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.87 GHz | 0.98 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
Typical power consumption | 2.03W | N/A |
Intel Atom N270 ![]() | AMD Athlon 900 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $32 | |
Intel Atom N450 vs N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $32 | |
Intel Atom N455 vs N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$42 | $32 | |
Intel Atom N2600 vs N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$69 | $32 | |
Intel Pentium 4 630 vs Atom N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | ||
AMD G G-T44R vs Intel Atom N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$63 | $32 | |
Intel Atom D525 vs N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | $32 | |
Intel Atom Z3735F vs N270 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||