Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom N270

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom N270

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 2.03W vs 72.31W 35.6x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 0.6 $/year vs 21.44 $/year 35.6x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 2.19 $/year vs 77.96 $/year 35.6x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 3000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 3000+

Report a correction
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom N270 vs Athlon 64 3000+

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom N270  vs
Athlon 64 3000+ 
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
437
754

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3

details

Atom N270  vs
Athlon 64 3000+ 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

TDP 2.5W 89W
Annual home energy cost 0.6 $/year 21.44 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 2.19 $/year 77.96 $/year
Typical power consumption 2.03W 72.31W
Intel Atom N270
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 3000+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus