Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom N2600

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom N2600

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Front view of Intel Atom E3827

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom E3827

Report a correction
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines

Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom N2600 vs E3827

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom N2600  vs
E3827 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.75 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 3.5W 8W
Annual home energy cost 0.84 $/year 1.93 $/year
Performance per watt 8.43 pt/W 4.49 pt/W
Typical power consumption 2.84W 6.5W

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Atom N2600  vs
E3827 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C -40 - 110°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.75 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.75 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.6 GHz 1.75 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Integrated HD
GPU clock speed 400 MHz 542 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3L-1333
Channels Single Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 6,400 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 2,498.56 MB 8,192 MB
Intel Atom N2600
Report a correction
Intel Atom E3827
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus