Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom E625CT

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom E625CT

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 5.69W vs 101.56W 17.9x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 1.69 $/year vs 30.11 $/year 17.9x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 6.13 $/year vs 109.5 $/year 17.9x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD FX 8320

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8320

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 0.5 MB 16x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 0.6 GHz More than 5.8x higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.56 GHz vs 0.6 GHz More than 7.5x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
More cores 8 vs 1 7 more cores; run more applications at once
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More threads 8 vs 2 6 more threads
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.75 GHz vs 0.6 GHz Around 8x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Oct, 2012 vs Nov, 2010 Release date over 1 years later

Features Key features of the Atom E625CT  vs FX 8320 

clock speed

Atom E625CT
0.6 GHz
FX 8320
3.5 GHz

L2 cache

Atom E625CT
0.5 MB
FX 8320
8 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Atom E625CT
0.6 GHz
FX 8320
4.56 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Atom E625CT
0.6 GHz
FX 8320
4.75 GHz

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom E625CT  vs
FX 8320 
Clock speed 0.6 GHz 3.5 GHz
Cores Single core Octa core

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Atom E625CT  vs
FX 8320 
Threads 2 8
L2 cache 0.5 MB 8 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 32 nm

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 0.6 GHz 4.56 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 0.6 GHz 4.75 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 0.6 GHz 4.56 GHz

power consumption

TDP 7W 125W
Annual home energy cost 1.69 $/year 30.11 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 6.13 $/year 109.5 $/year
Typical power consumption 5.69W 101.56W
Intel Atom E625CT
Report a correction
AMD FX 8320
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus