Winner
Intel Atom E3845
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Atom E3845 based on its .
See full details Intel Atom E3845 vs E3827 |
VS
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E3845 vs E3827 among laptop CPUs (up to 15W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 4 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the E3845 vs the E3827. | |||||||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the E3827 vs the E3845. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom E3845 vs E3827
CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Atom E3845 | vs | E3827 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.91 GHz | 1.75 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| BGA 1170 | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| AES | |||
| EM64T | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 10W | 8W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 1.93 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 11.4 pt/W | 4.49 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 6.5W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | Atom E3845 | vs | E3827 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | -40 - 110°C | -40 - 110°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.92 GHz | 1.75 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.91 GHz | 1.75 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.92 GHz | 1.75 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | HD | HD | |
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | 542 MHz | 542 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 792 MHz | 792 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1333 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB | |
 Intel Atom E3845  Report a correction |  Intel Atom E3827 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $52 | $82 | |
| E3845 vs J1900 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $52 | $107 | |
| E3845 vs N2807 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $52 | ||
| E3845 vs J3160 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $52 | ||
| E3845 vs E3950 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $52 | ||
| E3845 vs E3940 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $52 | ||
| E3845 vs GX-420CA | ||
| | VS |  |
| $52 | $145 | |
| E3845 vs N2930 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
