CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E3845 vs C2518 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Atom E3845 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Atom E3845  based on its power consumption and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom E3845

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom E3845

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 317,450 MB/s vs 289.5 MB/s More than 1096.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better performance per dollar 2.19 pt/$ vs 0.46 pt/$ Around 4.8x better performance per dollar
Higher clock speed 1.91 GHz vs 1.7 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Much better performance per watt 11.4 pt/W vs 3.24 pt/W More than 3.5x better performance per watt
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Jul, 2013 Release date 3 months later
Front view of Intel Atom C2518

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom C2518

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the C2518 vs the E3845.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom E3845 vs C2518

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom E3845
2,624
Atom C2518
2,369

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom E3845
317,450 MB/s
Atom C2518
289.5 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom E3845  vs
C2518 
Clock speed 1.91 GHz 1.7 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
AES
EM64T
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 32,768 MB

details

Atom E3845  vs
C2518 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label HD N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 542 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 792 MHz N/A

power consumption

TDP 10W 13W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 3.13 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 11.39 $/year
Performance per watt 11.4 pt/W 3.24 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 10.56W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Atom E3845
Report a correction
Intel Atom C2518
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus