Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom E3827

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom E3827

Report a correction
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Front view of Intel Atom D2550

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom D2550

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the D2550 vs the E3827.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom E3827 vs D2550

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom E3827  vs
D2550 
Clock speed 1.75 GHz 1.86 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 8W 10W
Annual home energy cost 1.93 $/year 2.41 $/year
Performance per watt 4.49 pt/W 3.59 pt/W
Typical power consumption 6.5W 8.13W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1

details

Atom E3827  vs
D2550 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature -40 - 110°C Unknown - 100°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.75 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.75 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.75 GHz 1.87 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label HD Integrated
Number of displays supported 2 2
GPU clock speed 542 MHz 640 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1066
DDR3L-1333
DDR3-800
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 8,533.33 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 4,096 MB
Intel Atom E3827
Report a correction
Intel Atom D2550
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus