Intel Atom E3825 vs E3805 |
Released October, 2013
Intel Atom E3825
- 1.33 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Atom E3825
 | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
VS
Released October, 2014
Intel Atom E3805
- 1.33 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the E3805
| | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | | Newer Oct, 2014 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
| Newer | Oct, 2014 | vs | Oct, 2013 | Release date 11 months later | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Atom E3825 vs E3805
clock speed
L2 cache
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Atom E3825 | vs | E3805 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 1.33 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| AES | |||
| EM64T | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 6W | 3W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 0.72 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | 2.63 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 2.44W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | Atom E3825 | vs | E3805 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 1.33 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.33 GHz | 1.33 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.33 GHz | 1.33 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | HD | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 2 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 533 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Single Channel | Single Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 6,400 MB/s | 6,400 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB | |
 Intel Atom E3825  Report a correction |  Intel Atom E3805 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $34 | $82 | |
| E3825 vs J1900 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $34 | $52 | |
| E3825 vs E3845 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $34 | ||
| E3825 vs E3930 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $34 | $163 | |
| E3825 vs N2930 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $34 | $63 | |
| E3825 vs D525 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $34 | $31 | |
| E3825 vs E3815 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $34 | ||
| E3825 vs E3950 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
