0 Comments
| Intel Atom E3805 vs C2308 |
Released October, 2014
Intel Atom E3805
- 1.33 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Atom E3805
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Newer Oct, 2014 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Newer | Oct, 2014 | vs | Apr, 2014 | Release date 6 months later | |||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the C2308 vs the E3805. | |||||||
Features Key features of the Atom E3805 vs C2308
clock speed
Atom E3805
1.33 GHz
Atom C2308
1.25 GHz
overclocked clock speed (air)
Atom E3805
1.33 GHz
Atom C2308
1.25 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Atom E3805
1.33 GHz
Atom C2308
1.25 GHz
TDP
Atom E3805
3W
Atom C2308
6W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Atom E3805 | vs | C2308 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 3W | 6W | |
Annual home energy cost | 0.72 $/year | 1.45 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 2.63 $/year | 5.26 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 2.44W | 4.88W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Atom E3805 | vs | C2308 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.33 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.33 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Single Channel | Single Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 6,400 MB/s | 10,666.66 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 16,384 MB |
Intel Atom E3805 ![]() | Intel Atom C2308 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$31 | $31 | |
Intel Atom E3815 vs E3805 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$34 | $31 | |
Intel Atom E3825 vs E3805 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$47 | $31 | |
Intel Atom N2800 vs E3805 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $31 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs Atom E3805 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$31 | ||
Intel E3930 vs Atom E3805 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$52 | $31 | |
Intel Atom E3845 vs E3805 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $60 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Atom C2308 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||