Intel Atom E3805 vs C2308 |
Released October, 2014
Intel Atom E3805
- 1.33 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Atom E3805
 | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | | Newer Oct, 2014 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Newer | Oct, 2014 | vs | Apr, 2014 | Release date 6 months later | |||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the C2308 vs the E3805. | |||||||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Atom E3805 vs C2308
clock speed
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Atom E3805 | vs | C2308 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 3W | 6W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 0.72 $/year | 1.45 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 2.63 $/year | 5.26 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 2.44W | 4.88W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | Atom E3805 | vs | C2308 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.33 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.33 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Single Channel | Single Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 6,400 MB/s | 10,666.66 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 16,384 MB | |
 Intel Atom E3805  Report a correction |  Intel Atom C2308 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $31 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs Atom E3805 | ||
 | VS | |
| $31 | ||
| Intel E3930 vs Atom E3805 | ||
 | VS | |
| $34 | $31 | |
| Intel Atom E3825 vs E3805 | ||
 | VS | |
| $47 | $31 | |
| Intel Atom N2800 vs E3805 | ||
 | VS | |
| $31 | $31 | |
| Intel Atom E3815 vs E3805 | ||
 | VS | |
| $851 | $31 | |
| Intel Core2 Quad Q9100 vs Atom E3805 | ||
 | VS | |
| $41 | $31 | |
| Intel Atom E3827 vs E3805 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
