Intel Atom D525 vs C2358 |
Released June, 2010
Intel Atom D525
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Intel Atom D525
 | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.12 GHz |
| | More threads 4 |
VS
Released July, 2013
Intel Atom C2358
- 1.7 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the C2358
| | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | Has virtualization support Yes |
| | Significantly better performance per watt 6.4 pt/W | | Better performance per dollar 0.75 pt/$ |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Intel Atom C2358CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.12 GHz | vs | 1.7 GHz | Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Significantly better performance per watt | 6.4 pt/W | vs | 2.62 pt/W | Around 2.5x better performance per watt | |||
| Better performance per dollar | 0.75 pt/$ | vs | 0.54 pt/$ | Around 40% better performance per dollar | |||
| Newer | Jul, 2013 | vs | Jun, 2010 | Release date over 3 years later | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 5.69W | vs | 10.56W | More than 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 448 | vs | 284 | Around 60% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 1.69 $/year | vs | 3.13 $/year | More than 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 6.13 $/year | vs | 11.39 $/year | More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom D525 vs C2358
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Atom D525 | vs | C2358 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.7 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 13W | 7W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 3.13 $/year | 1.69 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 11.39 $/year | 6.13 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.62 pt/W | 6.4 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 10.56W | 5.69W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | Atom D525 | vs | C2358 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.12 GHz | 1.7 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 1.7 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.12 GHz | 1.7 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Integrated | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR3-800 | |||
| DDR2-800 | |||
| DDR2-667 | |||
| DDR2 | |||
| Channels | Single Channel | Single Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 6,400 MB/s | 6,400 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 4,096 MB | 16,384 MB | |
 Intel Atom D525  Report a correction |  Intel Atom C2358 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $47 | $63 | |
| Intel Atom D2550 vs D525 | ||
 | VS | |
| $82 | $63 | |
| Intel Celeron J1900 vs Atom D525 | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | $63 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Atom D525 | ||
 | VS | |
| $63 | ||
| AMD E 350 vs Intel Atom D525 | ||
 | VS | |
| $72 | $63 | |
| Intel Celeron J1800 vs Atom D525 | ||
 | VS | |
| $134 | $63 | |
| Intel Celeron 847 vs Atom D525 | ||
 | VS | |
| $42 | $63 | |
| Intel Atom N2600 vs D525 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
| | VS | |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
