Intel Atom D525 vs AMD E 350 |
Released June, 2010
Intel Atom D525
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Intel Atom D525
 | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 891 | | Is unlocked Yes |
| | Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz | | Significantly lower typical power consumption 10.56W |
VS
Released January, 2011
AMD E 350
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD E 350
| | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 51,600 MB/s | | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
| | Has virtualization support Yes | | Newer manufacturing process 40 nm |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 891 | vs | 24 | Around 37.2x better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1.8 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 10.56W | vs | 30.2W | 2.9x lower typical power consumption | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Better performance per watt | 2.62 pt/W | vs | 1.5 pt/W | Around 75% better performance per watt | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 3.13 $/year | vs | 12 $/year | 3.8x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 11.39 $/year | vs | 28.21 $/year | 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 51,600 MB/s | vs | 28,100 MB/s | Around 85% better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Newer manufacturing process | 40 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2.12 GHz | More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.5 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 95% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2011 | vs | Jun, 2010 | Release date 6 months later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom D525 vs E 350
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Atom D525 | vs | E 350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Is unlocked | Yes | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 13W | 18W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 3.13 $/year | 12 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 11.39 $/year | 28.21 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.62 pt/W | 1.5 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 10.56W | 30.2W | |
details | Atom D525 | vs | E 350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 40 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Voltage range | 0.8 - 1.18V | 1.25 - 1.35V | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.12 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.12 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Integrated | Radeon™ HD 6310 | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR3-800 | |||
| DDR2-800 | |||
| DDR2-667 | |||
| DDR2 | |||
 Intel Atom D525  Report a correction |  AMD E 350 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $125 | ||
| AMD E 350 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $179 | ||
| AMD E 350 vs Intel Core2 Duo E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $134 | ||
| AMD E 350 vs Intel Celeron 847 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $82 | ||
| AMD E 350 vs Intel Celeron J1900 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $63 | $47 | |
| Intel Atom D525 vs D2550 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $63 | $225 | |
| Intel Atom D525 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
| | VS | |
| $63 | $82 | |
| Intel Atom D525 vs Celeron J1900 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
| | VS | |
| $134 | $225 | |
| Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
