0 Comments
| Intel Atom D525 vs AMD E 350 |
Released June, 2010
Intel Atom D525
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Intel Atom D525
![]() | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 891 | ![]() | Is unlocked Yes |
![]() | Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz | ![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 10.56W |
VS
Released January, 2011
AMD E 350
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD E 350
![]() | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 51,600 MB/s | ![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
![]() | Has virtualization support Yes | ![]() | Newer manufacturing process 40 nm |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Atom D525CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 891 | vs | 24 | Around 37.2x better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
Higher clock speed | 1.8 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 10.56W | vs | 30.2W | 2.9x lower typical power consumption | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Better performance per watt | 2.62 pt/W | vs | 1.5 pt/W | Around 75% better performance per watt | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 3.13 $/year | vs | 12 $/year | 3.8x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 11.39 $/year | vs | 28.21 $/year | 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 51,600 MB/s | vs | 28,100 MB/s | Around 85% better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 40 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2.12 GHz | More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.5 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 95% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Jan, 2011 | vs | Jun, 2010 | Release date 6 months later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom D525 vs E 350
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Atom D525 | vs | E 350 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Is unlocked | Yes | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
AMD64 | |||
AMD-V | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 13W | 18W | |
Annual home energy cost | 3.13 $/year | 12 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 11.39 $/year | 28.21 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.62 pt/W | 1.5 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 10.56W | 30.2W |
details | Atom D525 | vs | E 350 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 40 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Voltage range | 0.8 - 1.18V | 1.25 - 1.35V | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.12 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.12 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Integrated | Radeon™ HD 6310 | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
DDR2-800 | |||
DDR2-667 | |||
DDR2 |
Intel Atom D525 ![]() | AMD E 350 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$63 | $47 | |
Intel Atom D525 vs D2550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$63 | $82 | |
Intel Atom D525 vs Celeron J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$63 | $72 | |
Intel Atom D525 vs Celeron J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
AMD E 350 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
AMD E 350 vs 450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | ||
AMD E 350 vs Intel Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | ||
AMD E 350 vs Intel Celeron J1900 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||