Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Atom D525

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Atom D525

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom D525

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom D525

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 891 vs 24 Around 37.2x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Significantly lower typical power consumption 10.56W vs 30.2W 2.9x lower typical power consumption
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better performance per watt 2.62 pt/W vs 1.5 pt/W Around 75% better performance per watt
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 3.13 $/year vs 12 $/year 3.8x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 11.39 $/year vs 28.21 $/year 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 51,600 MB/s vs 28,100 MB/s Around 85% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz vs 2.12 GHz More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 95% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Jan, 2011 vs Jun, 2010 Release date 6 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom D525 vs E 350

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom D525
1,038
E 350
1,096

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom D525
432
E 350
620

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom D525
28,100 MB/s
E 350
51,600 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom D525
1,010
E 350
1,032

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom D525
1,659
E 350
1,201

GeekBench

Atom D525
1,659
E 350
1,861

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Atom D525
701
E 350
782

PassMark (Single Core)

Atom D525
284
E 350
420

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom D525  vs
E 350 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 13W 18W
Annual home energy cost 3.13 $/year 12 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 11.39 $/year 28.21 $/year
Performance per watt 2.62 pt/W 1.5 pt/W
Typical power consumption 10.56W 30.2W

details

Atom D525  vs
E 350 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 0.8 - 1.18V 1.25 - 1.35V

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.12 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.12 GHz 3.5 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Integrated Radeon™ HD 6310

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1066
DDR3
DDR3-800
DDR2-800
DDR2-667
DDR2
Intel Atom D525
Report a correction
AMD E 350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus