Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 3200+

AMD Athlon 64 3200+

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom D410

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom D410

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 26,400 MB/s vs 52.6 MB/s Around 502x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 72.31W 8.9x lower typical power consumption
Newer Jan, 2010 vs May, 2006 Release date over 3 years later
Better performance per watt 2.62 pt/W vs 0.34 pt/W More than 7.5x better performance per watt
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 21.44 $/year 8.9x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 77.96 $/year 8.9x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 3200+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 3200+

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.66 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.69 GHz vs 1.67 GHz More than 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.87 GHz vs 1.67 GHz More than 70% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom D410 vs Athlon 64 3200+

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom D410
26,400 MB/s
Athlon 64 3200+
52.6 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom D410  vs
Athlon 64 3200+ 
Clock speed 1.66 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Single core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

details

Atom D410  vs
Athlon 64 3200+ 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.67 GHz 2.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.67 GHz 2.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.67 GHz 2.69 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 89W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 21.44 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 77.96 $/year
Performance per watt 2.62 pt/W 0.34 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 72.31W
Intel Atom D410
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus