0 Comments
| Intel Atom D2700 vs C2538 |
Released September, 2011
Intel Atom D2700
- 2.13 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Atom D2700
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Slightly lower typical power consumption 8.13W |
![]() | Slightly lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year | ![]() | Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year |
VS
Released July, 2013
Intel Atom C2538
- 2.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the C2538
![]() | Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
![]() | Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz | ![]() | More cores 4 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Slightly lower typical power consumption | 8.13W | vs | 12.19W | Around 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | vs | 3.61 $/year | Around 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | vs | 13.14 $/year | Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Newer | Jul, 2013 | vs | Sep, 2011 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Features Key features of the Atom D2700 vs C2538
clock speed
Atom D2700
2.13 GHz
Atom C2538
2.4 GHz
overclocked clock speed (air)
Atom D2700
2.13 GHz
Atom C2538
2.4 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Atom D2700
2.13 GHz
Atom C2538
2.4 GHz
TDP
Atom D2700
10W
Atom C2538
15W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Atom D2700 | vs | C2538 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 10W | 15W | |
Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 13.14 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 12.19W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Atom D2700 | vs | C2538 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.13 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.13 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Integrated | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 640 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Single Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 8,533.33 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 4,096 MB | 65,536 MB |
Intel Atom D2700 ![]() | Intel Atom C2538 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$104 | ||
C2538 vs J3455 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$104 | ||
C2538 vs N3710 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$104 | $82 | |
C2538 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$52 | $63 | |
D2700 vs D525 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$52 | $47 | |
D2700 vs D2550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$52 | $82 | |
D2700 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$52 | $72 | |
D2700 vs J1800 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
Guest (10:37 AM, December 7, 2016)