Intel Atom D2700 vs C2538 |
Released September, 2011
Intel Atom D2700
- 2.13 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Atom D2700
 | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Slightly lower typical power consumption 8.13W |
| | Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year | | Slightly lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year |
VS
Released July, 2013
Intel Atom C2538
- 2.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the C2538
| | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | Has virtualization support Yes |
| | Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz | | More cores 4 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slightly lower typical power consumption | 8.13W | vs | 12.19W | Around 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | vs | 13.14 $/year | Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | vs | 3.61 $/year | Around 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Newer | Jul, 2013 | vs | Sep, 2011 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Atom D2700 vs C2538
clock speed
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Atom D2700 | vs | C2538 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 10W | 15W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 13.14 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 12.19W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | Atom D2700 | vs | C2538 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.13 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.13 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Integrated | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 2 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 640 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3-800 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Single Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 8,533.33 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 4,096 MB | 65,536 MB | |
 Intel Atom D2700  Report a correction |  Intel Atom C2538 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $104 | ||
| C2538 vs J3455 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $104 | $86 | |
| C2538 vs C2550 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $104 | ||
| C2538 vs N3710 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $104 | ||
| C2538 vs J3355 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $104 | $107 | |
| C2538 vs N3150 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $52 | $63 | |
| D2700 vs D525 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $52 | $125 | |
| D2700 vs 3220T | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
 | VS | |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6100U vs N4200 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A6-9220 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
