Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Atom D2700

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Atom D2700

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom D2700

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom D2700

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.13 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher GPU clock speed 640 MHz vs 500 MHz Around 30% higher GPU clock speed
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 14.63W Around 45% lower typical power consumption
Higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 90 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 1,212 vs 513 More than 2.2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better performance per watt 2.89 pt/W vs 1.81 pt/W Around 60% better performance per watt
Newer Sep, 2011 vs Jan, 2011 Release date 8 months later
Lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 15.77 $/year Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 4.34 $/year Around 45% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD E 240

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 240

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 22.9 vs 8 More than 2.8x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 45,800 MB/s vs 33.3 MB/s Around 1375.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom D2700 vs E 240

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom D2700
1,212
E 240
513

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 240
522

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom D2700
33.3 MB/s
E 240
45,800 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom D2700
1,241
E 240
508

GeekBench

Atom D2700
1,241
E 240
929

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

E 240
22.9

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E 240
321

PassMark (Single Core)

E 240
350

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom D2700  vs
E 240 
Clock speed 2.13 GHz 1.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1066
DDR3-800
DDR3

details

Atom D2700  vs
E 240 
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 0.91 - 1.21V 1.18 - 1.35V
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Integrated Radeon™ HD 6310
GPU clock speed 640 MHz 500 MHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 18W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 15.77 $/year
Performance per watt 2.89 pt/W 1.81 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 14.63W
Intel Atom D2700
Report a correction
AMD E 240
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus