Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom D2550

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom D2550

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Front view of AMD Turion X2 72

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion X2 72

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines

Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom D2550 vs Turion X2 72

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom D2550
1,127
Turion X2 72
1,461

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom D2550
1,162
Turion X2 72
2,397

GeekBench

Atom D2550
1,162
Turion X2 72
2,397

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom D2550  vs
Turion X2 72 
Clock speed 1.86 GHz 2.1 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

details

Atom D2550  vs
Turion X2 72 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 0.98 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.49 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 100°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Integrated N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 640 MHz N/A

power consumption

TDP 10W 35W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 3.59 pt/W 1.61 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 28.44W
Intel Atom D2550
Report a correction
AMD Turion X2 72
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus