Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD E 350

AMD E 350

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom D2550

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom D2550

Report a correction
Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 1.86 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Significantly lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 30.2W 3.7x lower typical power consumption
Higher GPU clock speed 640 MHz vs 492 MHz More than 30% higher GPU clock speed
Better performance per watt 3.59 pt/W vs 1.5 pt/W Around 2.5x better performance per watt
Higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 90 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 12 $/year 5x lower annual home energy cost
Newer Mar, 2012 vs Jan, 2011 Release date over 1 years later
Lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 28.21 $/year 3.2x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 51,600 MB/s vs 29,700 MB/s Around 75% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz vs 1.87 GHz Around 90% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz vs 1.87 GHz Around 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom D2550 vs E 350

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom D2550
1,147
E 350
1,096

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 350
620

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom D2550
29,700 MB/s
E 350
51,600 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom D2550
1,127
E 350
1,032

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom D2550
1,162
E 350
1,201

GeekBench

Atom D2550
1,162
E 350
1,861

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E 350
782

PassMark (Single Core)

E 350
420

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom D2550  vs
E 350 
Clock speed 1.86 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 10W 18W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 12 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 28.21 $/year
Performance per watt 3.59 pt/W 1.5 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 30.2W

details

Atom D2550  vs
E 350 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 0.91 - 1.21V 1.25 - 1.35V
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 90°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.87 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.87 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.87 GHz 3.5 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Integrated Radeon™ HD 6310
GPU clock speed 640 MHz 492 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1066
DDR3-800
DDR3
Intel Atom D2550
Report a correction
AMD E 350
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus