CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of C2758 vs C2750 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Atom C2750

Intel Atom C2750

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom C2758

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom C2758

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the C2758 vs the C2750.

Front view of Intel Atom C2750

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom C2750

Report a correction
Much better performance per watt 11.79 pt/W vs 4.02 pt/W Around 3x better performance per watt
Much better performance per dollar 1.38 pt/$ vs 0.39 pt/$ More than 3.5x better performance per dollar

Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom C2758 vs C2750

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom C2758
2,292
Atom C2750
6,808

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom C2758
52,100 MB/s
Atom C2750
412,200 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Atom C2758
3,162
Atom C2750
3,344

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom C2758  vs
C2750 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Octa core Octa core

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 20W 20W
Annual home energy cost 4.82 $/year 4.82 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 17.52 $/year 17.52 $/year
Performance per watt 4.02 pt/W 11.79 pt/W
Typical power consumption 16.25W 16.25W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Atom C2758  vs
C2750 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 8
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Intel Atom C2758
Report a correction
Intel Atom C2750
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
The specifications from Intel seem to indicate that the C2758 supports 64-bit operation, while the C2750 does not.
comments powered by Disqus