0 Comments
| Intel Atom C2758 vs C2558 |
Released July, 2013
Intel Atom C2758
- 2.4 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Atom C2758
![]() | More cores 8 | ![]() | More threads 8 |
VS
Released July, 2013
Intel Atom C2558
- 2.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the C2558
![]() | Slightly lower typical power consumption 12.19W | ![]() | Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year |
![]() | Slightly lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Atom C2758CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
More cores | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
| |||||||
Slightly lower typical power consumption | 12.19W | vs | 16.25W | 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 13.14 $/year | vs | 17.52 $/year | Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | vs | 4.82 $/year | Around 25% lower annual home energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom C2758 vs C2558
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Atom C2758
2,292
Atom C2558
3,118
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Atom C2758
819
Atom C2558
982
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Atom C2758
52,100 MB/s
Atom C2558
396.2 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Atom C2758
3,162
Atom C2558
2,169
PassMark (Single Core)
Atom C2758
513
Atom C2558
551
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Atom C2758 | vs | C2558 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Octa core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 20W | 15W | |
Annual home energy cost | 4.82 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 17.52 $/year | 13.14 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 4.02 pt/W | 4.2 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 16.25W | 12.19W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Atom C2758 | vs | C2558 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 8 | 4 | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 65,536 MB | 65,536 MB |
Intel Atom C2758 ![]() | Intel Atom C2558 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$208 | $171 | |
C2758 vs C2750 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$208 | $250 | |
C2758 vs E3-1230 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$208 | $581 | |
C2758 vs D-1540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$208 | $130 | |
C2758 vs 4130T | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$208 | $414 | |
C2758 vs 3612QE | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$208 | $236 | |
C2758 vs E3-1225 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$104 | $82 | |
C2558 vs J1900 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||