CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of C2758 vs C2558 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores
Atom C2758
5.3
Atom C2558
5.2
Atom C2750
5.4
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance
Atom C2758
6.9
Atom C2558
5.4
Atom C2750
7.1
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Atom C2758
n.d.
Atom C2558
n.d.
Atom C2750
n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Atom C2758
0.0
Atom C2558
0.0
Atom C2750
0.0
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Atom C2758
5.5
Atom C2558
5.6
Atom C2750
5.5
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?
Atom C2758
n.d.
Atom C2558
n.d.
Atom C2750
n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more
5

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets
Atom C2758
5.0
Atom C2558
4.7
Atom C2750
5.1

Winner
Intel Atom C2758 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Atom C2758  based on its performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Atom C2758

CPUBoss Winner
 Front view of Intel Atom C2758
Front view of Intel Atom C2558

Intel Atom C2558

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom C2758

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom C2758

Report a correction
More cores 8 vs 4 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Front view of Intel Atom C2558

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom C2558

Report a correction
Slightly lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 16.25W 25% lower typical power consumption
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 17.52 $/year Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 4.82 $/year Around 25% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom C2758 vs C2558

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom C2758
2,292
Atom C2558
3,118

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom C2758
819
Atom C2558
982

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom C2758
52,100 MB/s
Atom C2558
396.2 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Atom C2758
3,162
Atom C2558
2,169

PassMark (Single Core)

Atom C2758
513
Atom C2558
551

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Atom C2758  vs
C2558 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Octa core Quad core

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
EM64T
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption
TDP 20W 15W
Annual home energy cost 4.82 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 17.52 $/year 13.14 $/year
Performance per watt 4.02 pt/W 4.2 pt/W
Typical power consumption 16.25W 12.19W

bus
Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

 Atom C2758  vs
C2558 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 4
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 65,536 MB 65,536 MB
Intel Atom C2758
Report a correction
Intel Atom C2558
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss