Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom C2758

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom C2758

Report a correction
Newer manufacturing process 22 nms vs 32 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More cores 8 vs 4 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Slightly lower typical power consumption 16.25W vs 28.44W Around 45% lower typical power consumption
Marginally newer Jul, 2013 vs May, 2012 Release date over 1 years later
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 17.52 $/year vs 30.66 $/year Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 4.82 $/year vs 8.43 $/year Around 45% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD R R-464L

Reasons to consider the
AMD R R-464L

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed

Features Key features of the Atom C2758  vs R R-464L 

clock speed

Atom C2758
2.4 GHz
R R-464L
2.3 GHz

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom C2758  vs
R R-464L 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.3 GHz
Cores Octa core Quad core
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
SSE3
SSE2
EM64T
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

details

Atom C2758  vs
R R-464L 
Threads 8 4
Manufacture process 22 nms 32 nms
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

TDP 20W 35W
Annual home energy cost 4.82 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 17.52 $/year 30.66 $/year
Typical power consumption 16.25W 28.44W
Intel Atom C2758
Report a correction
AMD R R-464L
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus