CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of C2750 vs C2550 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom C2750

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom C2750

Report a correction
More cores 8 vs 4 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Front view of Intel Atom C2550

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom C2550

Report a correction
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Slightly lower typical power consumption 11.38W vs 16.25W 30% lower typical power consumption
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 12.26 $/year vs 17.52 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 3.37 $/year vs 4.82 $/year 30% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom C2750 vs C2550

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom C2750
6,808
Atom C2550
3,615

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom C2750
1,089
Atom C2550
1,028

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom C2750
412,200 MB/s
Atom C2550
422,300 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Atom C2750
3,344
Atom C2550
2,329

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom C2750  vs
C2550 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.6 GHz 2.6 GHz
Cores Octa core Quad core

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 20W 14W
Annual home energy cost 4.82 $/year 3.37 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 17.52 $/year 12.26 $/year
Performance per watt 11.79 pt/W 15.1 pt/W
Typical power consumption 16.25W 11.38W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Atom C2750  vs
C2550 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 4
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 97°C Unknown - 96°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.58 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz 2.58 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Intel Atom C2750
Report a correction
Intel Atom C2550
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus