0 Comments
| Intel Atom C2558 vs C2550 |
VS
Released July, 2013
Intel Atom C2550
- 2.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the C2550
![]() | Much better performance per watt 15.1 pt/W | ![]() | Much better performance per dollar 2.46 pt/$ |
![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | Intel Atom C2550CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the C2558 vs the C2550. | |||||||
| |||||||
Much better performance per watt | 15.1 pt/W | vs | 4.2 pt/W | More than 3.5x better performance per watt | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better performance per dollar | 2.46 pt/$ | vs | 0.61 pt/$ | More than 4x better performance per dollar | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.58 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom C2558 vs C2550
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Atom C2558
3,118
Atom C2550
3,615
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Atom C2558
982
Atom C2550
1,028
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Atom C2558
396.2 MB/s
Atom C2550
422,300 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Atom C2558
2,169
Atom C2550
2,329
PassMark (Single Core)
Atom C2558
551
Atom C2550
596
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Atom C2558 | vs | C2550 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 15W | 14W | |
Annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | 3.37 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 13.14 $/year | 12.26 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 4.2 pt/W | 15.1 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 12.19W | 11.38W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Atom C2558 | vs | C2550 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.4 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 65,536 MB | 65,536 MB |
Intel Atom C2558 ![]() | Intel Atom C2550 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$86 | $171 | |
Intel Atom C2550 vs C2750 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$86 | $98 | |
Intel Atom C2550 vs Core i3 4130 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$86 | $82 | |
Intel Atom C2550 vs Celeron J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$86 | $208 | |
Intel Atom C2550 vs C2758 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$86 | $104 | |
Intel Atom C2550 vs C2538 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$104 | $82 | |
Intel Atom C2558 vs Celeron J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$104 | $208 | |
Intel Atom C2558 vs C2758 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||