Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom C2558

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom C2558

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the C2558 vs the C2538.

Front view of Intel Atom C2538

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom C2538

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the C2538 vs the C2558.

Features Key features of the Atom C2558  vs C2538 

clock speed

Atom C2558
2.4 GHz
Atom C2538
2.4 GHz

overclocked clock speed (air)

Atom C2558
2.4 GHz
Atom C2538
2.4 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Atom C2558
2.4 GHz
Atom C2538
2.4 GHz

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom C2558  vs
C2538 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 15W 15W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 13.14 $/year
Typical power consumption 12.19W 12.19W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Atom C2558  vs
C2538 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 65,536 MB 65,536 MB
Intel Atom C2558
Report a correction
Intel Atom C2538
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus