0 Comments
| Intel Atom C2558 vs C2508 |
Released July, 2013
Intel Atom C2558
- 2.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Atom C2558
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.4 GHz | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz | ![]() | Supports more RAM 65,536 MB |
VS
Released April, 2014
Intel Atom C2508
- 1.25 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the C2508
![]() | Slightly lower typical power consumption 7.72W | ![]() | Newer Apr, 2014 |
![]() | Slightly lower annual home energy cost 2.29 $/year | ![]() | Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 8.32 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 1.25 GHz | More than 90% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.4 GHz | vs | 1.25 GHz | More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | vs | 1.25 GHz | More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Supports more RAM | 65,536 MB | vs | 32,768 MB | Supports 2x more RAM | |||
| |||||||
Slightly lower typical power consumption | 7.72W | vs | 12.19W | More than 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
Newer | Apr, 2014 | vs | Jul, 2013 | Release date 9 months later | |||
Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 2.29 $/year | vs | 3.61 $/year | More than 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 8.32 $/year | vs | 13.14 $/year | More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Atom C2558 vs C2508
clock speed
Atom C2558
2.4 GHz
Atom C2508
1.25 GHz
overclocked clock speed (air)
Atom C2558
2.4 GHz
Atom C2508
1.25 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Atom C2558
2.4 GHz
Atom C2508
1.25 GHz
TDP
Atom C2558
15W
Atom C2508
9.5W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Atom C2558 | vs | C2508 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 15W | 9.5W | |
Annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | 2.29 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 13.14 $/year | 8.32 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 12.19W | 7.72W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Atom C2558 | vs | C2508 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.4 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 21,333.32 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 65,536 MB | 32,768 MB |
Intel Atom C2558 ![]() | Intel Atom C2508 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $104 | |
J1900 vs C2558 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $104 | |
N3700 vs C2558 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$104 | ||
J3160 vs C2558 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$52 | $104 | |
E3845 vs C2558 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$208 | $104 | |
C2758 vs C2558 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$86 | $104 | |
C2550 vs C2558 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$60 | $104 | |
C2358 vs C2558 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||