CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of C2558 vs C2358 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

4.9

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Atom C2558 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Atom C2558  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom C2558

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom C2558

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.7 GHz More than 40% higher clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz vs 1.7 GHz More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Supports more RAM 65,536 MB vs 16,384 MB Supports 4x more RAM
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz vs 1.7 GHz More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom C2358

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom C2358

Report a correction
Much better performance per watt 6.4 pt/W vs 4.2 pt/W More than 50% better performance per watt
Lower typical power consumption 5.69W vs 12.19W 2.1x lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 1.69 $/year vs 3.61 $/year 2.1x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 6.13 $/year vs 13.14 $/year 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom C2558 vs C2358

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom C2558  vs
C2358 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 1.7 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 15W 7W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 1.69 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 6.13 $/year
Performance per watt 4.2 pt/W 6.4 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 5.69W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Atom C2558  vs
C2358 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.4 GHz 1.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 1.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz 1.7 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 6,400 MB/s
Maximum memory size 65,536 MB 16,384 MB
Intel Atom C2558
Report a correction
Intel Atom C2358
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus