Winner
Intel Atom C2358
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Atom C2358 based on its value.
See full details | Intel Atom C2518 vs C2358 |
![]() | More cores 4 | ![]() | More threads 4 |
![]() | Supports more RAM 32,768 MB |
![]() | Much better performance per watt 6.4 pt/W | ![]() | Slightly lower typical power consumption 5.69W |
![]() | Slightly lower annual home energy cost 1.69 $/year | ![]() | Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 6.13 $/year |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
4.9 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Supports more RAM | 32,768 MB | vs | 16,384 MB | Supports 2x more RAM | |||
| |||||||
Much better performance per watt | 6.4 pt/W | vs | 3.24 pt/W | More than 95% better performance per watt | |||
Slightly lower typical power consumption | 5.69W | vs | 10.56W | More than 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 1.69 $/year | vs | 3.13 $/year | More than 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 6.13 $/year | vs | 11.39 $/year | More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost |
summary | Atom C2518 | vs | C2358 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 1.7 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | No | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Single Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 6,400 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 16,384 MB |
details | Atom C2518 | vs | C2358 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 13W | 7W | |
Annual home energy cost | 3.13 $/year | 1.69 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 11.39 $/year | 6.13 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.24 pt/W | 6.4 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 10.56W | 5.69W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Atom C2518 ![]() | Intel Atom C2358 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$60 | ||
C2358 vs GX-415GA | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$60 | $82 | |
C2358 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$60 | $63 | |
C2358 vs D525 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$60 | $47 | |
C2358 vs D2550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$60 | $104 | |
C2358 vs C2558 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$91 | $82 | |
C2518 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$91 | $300 | |
C2518 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||