CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 330 vs 350 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Atom 330
n.d.
E 350
n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

6.2

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Atom 330 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Atom 330  based on its power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Atom 330

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Atom 330

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom 330

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom 330

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 824.5 vs 24 More than 34.2x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Significantly lower typical power consumption 6.5W vs 30.2W 4.6x lower typical power consumption
Better performance per watt 3.77 pt/W vs 1.5 pt/W More than 2.5x better performance per watt
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Much lower annual home energy cost 1.93 $/year vs 12 $/year 6.2x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 7.01 $/year vs 28.21 $/year 4x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 51,600 MB/s vs 25,200 MB/s More than 2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz vs 2.05 GHz More than 70% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Jan, 2011 vs Sep, 2008 Release date over 2 years later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 85.2 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature

Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom 330 vs E 350

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom 330
955
E 350
1,096

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom 330
381
E 350
620

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom 330
25,200 MB/s
E 350
51,600 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom 330
873
E 350
1,032

GeekBench

Atom 330
873
E 350
1,861

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

Atom 330
1,908
E 350
2,251

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Atom 330
592
E 350
782

PassMark (Single Core)

Atom 330
252
E 350
420

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom 330  vs
E 350 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 8W 18W
Annual home energy cost 1.93 $/year 12 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 7.01 $/year 28.21 $/year
Performance per watt 3.77 pt/W 1.5 pt/W
Typical power consumption 6.5W 30.2W

details

Atom 330  vs
E 350 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 12 8
Voltage range 0.9 - 1.16V 1.25 - 1.35V
Operating temperature Unknown - 85.2°C Unknown - 90°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.05 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.05 GHz 3.5 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6310
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 492 MHz
Intel Atom 330
Report a correction
AMD E 350
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus