Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom 330

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom 330

Report a correction
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Front view of AMD Athlon XP-M 2500+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP-M 2500+

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom 330 vs Athlon XP-M 2500+

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom 330  vs
Athlon XP-M 2500+ 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.87 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
437
462

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

bus

Clock speed 533 MHz 266 MHz

details

Atom 330  vs
Athlon XP-M 2500+ 
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.05 GHz 2.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.87 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 322.4 294.8
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.05 GHz 2.3 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption 6.5W N/A
Intel Atom 330
Report a correction
AMD Athlon XP-M 2500+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus