CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 330 vs K325 among laptop CPUs (up to 15W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom 330

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom 330

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Atom 330 vs the AMD Athlon II Neo K325.

Front view of AMD Athlon II Neo K325

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II Neo K325

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines

Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom 330 vs Athlon II Neo K325

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom 330
25,200 MB/s
Athlon II Neo K325
50.7 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom 330  vs
Athlon II Neo K325 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
437
S1

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 8W 12W
Annual home energy cost 1.93 $/year 2.89 $/year
Performance per watt 3.77 pt/W 2.62 pt/W
Typical power consumption 6.5W 9.75W

details

Atom 330  vs
Athlon II Neo K325 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.05 GHz 1.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.05 GHz 1.3 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Clock speed 533 MHz 1,000 MHz
Intel Atom 330
Report a correction
AMD Athlon II Neo K325
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus