0 Comments
| Intel Atom 230 vs AMD Geode NX 2001 |
Released June, 2008
Intel Atom 230
- 1.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Atom 230
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | Has a NX bit Yes |
![]() | More l2 cache 0.5 MB | ![]() | More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core |
VS
First seen on January, 2013
AMD Geode NX 2001
- 1.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Geode NX 2001
![]() | Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz | ![]() | Higher Maximum operating temperature 95 °C |
![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.25 GHz | ![]() | Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 130 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
More l2 cache | 0.5 MB | vs | 0.25 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 1.8 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 95 °C | vs | 85.2 °C | More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.25 GHz | vs | 1.89 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Features Key features of the Atom 230 vs Geode NX 2001
clock speed
Atom 230
1.6 GHz
Geode NX 2001
1.8 GHz
L2 cache
Atom 230
0.5 MB
Geode NX 2001
0.25 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Atom 230
1.89 GHz
Geode NX 2001
2.25 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Atom 230
1.6 GHz
Geode NX 2001
1.8 GHz
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Atom 230 | vs | Geode NX 2001 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
437 | |||
462 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
bus | |||
Clock speed | 533 MHz | 266 MHz |
details | Atom 230 | vs | Geode NX 2001 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.25 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 130 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 85.2°C | Unknown - 95°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.89 GHz | 2.25 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.89 GHz | 2.25 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
Typical power consumption | 3.25W | N/A |
Intel Atom 230 ![]() | AMD Geode NX 2001 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$29 | $43 | |
230 vs 330 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$29 | $63 | |
230 vs D525 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$29 | $63 | |
230 vs D510 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$29 | $32 | |
230 vs N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$29 | ||
230 vs 350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$29 | ||
230 vs 1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$29 | $43 | |
230 vs D410 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||