CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 230 vs 2100 among laptop CPUs (up to 15W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Atom 230 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Atom 230  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom 230

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom 230

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Atom 230 vs the AMD E1 2100.

Front view of AMD E1 2100

Reasons to consider the
AMD E1 2100

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines

Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom 230 vs E1 2100

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom 230
518
E1 2100
912

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom 230
374
E1 2100
529

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom 230
25,150 MB/s
E1 2100
494,700 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom 230
501
E1 2100
855

GeekBench

Atom 230
1,064
E1 2100
855

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Atom 230
308
E1 2100
627

PassMark (Single Core)

Atom 230
241
E1 2100
363

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom 230  vs
E1 2100 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 4W 9W
Annual home energy cost 0.96 $/year 2.17 $/year
Performance per watt 6.23 pt/W 16.08 pt/W
Typical power consumption 3.25W 7.31W

details

Atom 230  vs
E1 2100 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 85.2°C Unknown - 90°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.88 GHz 1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.88 GHz 1 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 8210
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 300 MHz
Intel Atom 230
Report a correction
AMD E1 2100
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus