Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom 230

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom 230

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1 GHz More than 60% higher clock speed
Significantly lower typical power consumption 3.25W vs 7.31W 2.2x lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 0.96 $/year vs 2.17 $/year 2.2x lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD E1 2100

Reasons to consider the
AMD E1 2100

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once

Features Key features of the Atom 230  vs E1 2100 

clock speed

Atom 230
1.6 GHz
E1 2100
1 GHz

L2 cache

Atom 230
0.5 MB
E1 2100
1 MB

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Atom 230  vs
E1 2100 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
FMA4
AES

details

Atom 230  vs
E1 2100 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 28 nm

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 8210
Latest DirectX N/A 12.0
GPU clock speed N/A 0 MHz

power consumption

TDP 4W 9W
Annual home energy cost 0.96 $/year 2.17 $/year
Typical power consumption 3.25W 7.31W
Intel Atom 230
Report a correction
AMD E1 2100
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus