Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel A100 Series A110

Reasons to consider the
Intel A100 Series A110

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 2.44W vs 13.81W 5.7x lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 0.72 $/year vs 4.1 $/year 5.7x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 2.63 $/year vs 14.89 $/year 5.7x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Opteron X1100 Series X1150

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron X1100 Series X1150

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 0.8 GHz Around 2.5x higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads

Features Key features of the A100 Series A110  vs Opteron X1100 Series X1150 

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

A100 Series A110  vs
Opteron X1100 Series X1150 
Clock speed 0.8 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Single core Quad core

power consumption

TDP 3W 17W
Annual home energy cost 0.72 $/year 4.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 2.63 $/year 14.89 $/year
Typical power consumption 2.44W 13.81W

details

A100 Series A110  vs
Opteron X1100 Series X1150 
Threads 1 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 28 nm
Intel A100 Series A110
Report a correction
AMD Opteron X1100 Series X1150
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus