CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4210U vs 5750M

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

4210U
6.1
A10 5750M
6.2
3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark and GeekBench

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

4210U
7.9
A10 5750M
7.4
Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

4210U
5.6
A10 5750M
5.3
TDP

Value

4210U
N/A
A10 5750M
N/A
Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Value

4210U
6.6
A10 5750M
6.4

Winner
Intel 4210U 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel 4210U  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel 4210U

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel 4210U

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel 4210U

Reasons to consider the
Intel 4210U

Report a correction
Is hyperthreaded Yes vs No Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core
Newer manufacturing process 22 nms vs 32 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly better performance per watt 30.69 pt/W vs 12.4 pt/W Around 2.5x better performance per watt
Lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 28.44W 2.3x lower typical power consumption
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,461 vs 1,230 Around 20% better PassMark (Single core) score
Marginally newer Apr, 2014 vs Mar, 2013 Release date over 1 years later
Lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 2.3x lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 2.3x lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD A10 5750M

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 5750M

Report a correction
Higher turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz Around 30% higher turbo clock speed
Higher clock speed 2.5 GHz vs 1.7 GHz More than 45% higher clock speed
More l2 cache 4 MB vs 0.5 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.12 GHz vs 2.39 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.5 GHz vs 1.7 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of 4210U vs A10 5750M

GeekBench (32-bit)

4210U
4,105
A10 5750M
3,894

GeekBench

4210U
4,105
A10 5750M
5,062

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

4210U
3,206
A10 5750M
3,238

Passmark

4210U
3,430
A10 5750M
3,814
4210U A10 5750M @ cpubenchmark.net

Passmark (Single Core)

4210U
1,461
A10 5750M
1,230

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

4210U  vs
A10 5750M 
Clock speed 1.7 GHz 2.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.7 GHz 3.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked No No
Is hyperthreaded Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
AVX
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AVX 2.0
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4400 Radeon™ HD 8650G
GPU clock speed 200 MHz 533 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz 720 MHz

details

4210U  vs
A10 5750M 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nms 32 nms
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.39 GHz 3.12 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.7 GHz 2.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.39 GHz 3.12 GHz

power consumption

TDP 15W 35W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 30.69 pt/W 12.4 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 28.44W
Intel 4210U
Report a correction
AMD A10 5750M
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus