Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Apple APL 2298

Reasons to consider the
Apple APL 2298

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Front view of AMD Athlon II X4 615e

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II X4 615e

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.5 GHz vs 0.8 GHz Around 3.2x higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.26 MB More than 7.8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.26 MB/core More than 95% more l2 cache per core
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Newer Sep, 2010 vs Sep, 2009 Release date over 1 years later

Features Key features of the APL 2298  vs Athlon II X4 615e 

clock speed

APL 2298
0.8 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

APL 2298  vs
Athlon II X4 615e 
Clock speed 0.8 GHz 2.5 GHz
Cores Single core Quad core

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label PowerVR SGX535 N/A
GPU clock speed 200 MHz N/A

details

APL 2298  vs
Athlon II X4 615e 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 1 4
L2 cache 0.26 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.26 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 36.56W
Apple APL 2298
Report a correction
AMD Athlon II X4 615e
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus