Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Apple APL 0298

Reasons to consider the
Apple APL 0298

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Apple APL 0298 vs the AMD A10 5800K.

Front view of AMD A10 5800K

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 5800K

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.8 GHz vs 0.6 GHz More than 6.2x higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 0.26 MB More than 15.5x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher GPU clock speed 800 MHz vs 150 MHz More than 5.2x higher GPU clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.26 MB/core Around 4x more l2 cache per core
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
Newer Oct, 2012 vs Jun, 2009 Release date over 3 years later
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads

Benchmarks Real world tests of APL 0298 vs A10 5800K

GeekBench

APL 0298
276
A10 5800K
8,036

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

APL 0298  vs
A10 5800K 
Clock speed 0.6 GHz 3.8 GHz
Cores Single core Quad core

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label PowerVR SGX535 Radeon™ HD 7660D
GPU clock speed 150 MHz 800 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in

details

APL 0298  vs
A10 5800K 
Threads 1 4
L2 cache 0.26 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.26 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 32 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 81.25W
Apple APL 0298
Report a correction
AMD A10 5800K
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus