Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Apple A5 (APL0498)

Reasons to consider the
Apple A5 (APL0498)

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Apple A5 (APL0498) vs the AMD A10 4657M.

Front view of AMD A10 4657M

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 4657M

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 1,240,000 MB/s vs 14,800 MB/s More than 83.8x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 1 GHz More than 2.2x higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 3,329 vs 415 More than 8x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Newer Mar, 2013 vs Mar, 2011 Release date over 2 years later
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads

Benchmarks Real world tests of A5 (APL0498) vs A10 4657M

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A5 (APL0498)
14,800 MB/s
A10 4657M
1,240,000 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

A5 (APL0498)  vs
A10 4657M 
Clock speed 1 GHz 2.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 28.44W

details

A5 (APL0498)  vs
A10 4657M 
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 32 nm
Apple A5 (APL0498)
Report a correction
AMD A10 4657M
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus