CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of v105 vs 350 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

6.2

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD E 350 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD E 350  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD E 350

AMD E 350

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD V Series PCs v105

Reasons to consider the
AMD V Series PCs v105

Report a correction
Significantly lower typical power consumption 7.31W vs 30.2W 4.1x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.17 $/year vs 12 $/year 5.5x lower annual home energy cost
Better performance per watt 2.45 pt/W vs 1.5 pt/W Around 65% better performance per watt
Lower annual commercial energy cost 7.88 $/year vs 28.21 $/year 3.6x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1.2 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz vs 1.34 GHz More than 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz vs 1.2 GHz Around 3x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Newer Jan, 2011 vs May, 2010 Release date 7 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of V Series PCs v105 vs E 350

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 350
1,032

GeekBench

E 350
1,861

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

V Series PCs v105  vs
E 350 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 9W 18W
Annual home energy cost 2.17 $/year 12 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 7.88 $/year 28.21 $/year
Performance per watt 2.45 pt/W 1.5 pt/W
Typical power consumption 7.31W 30.2W

details

V Series PCs v105  vs
E 350 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.34 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.2 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.34 GHz 3.5 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6310
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 492 MHz
AMD V Series PCs v105
Report a correction
AMD E 350
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus